Conference Strands

General Conference Strands

S01_ New Methods

Evaluation thrives when methods evolve. From established approaches to emerging tools and the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence, the aim is that this conference allows us to examine how technology and innovation can enhance rigor, relevance, and impact which is critical to strong democracies. Simultaneously allowing space for the exploration into adaptive, inclusive, and future-oriented methods that are relevant to the transformation into, and thereafter sustainability of, better societies.

S02_ Systemic Learning

Complex societal challenges demand more than isolated interventions. Therefore this conference will allow us to explore system-level approaches that drive transformational change, and how evaluators can navigate complexity while maintaining accountability and learning which is critical to healthy democracies.

S03_ Responsiveness

Democracies are dynamic - and so is evaluation. Responsiveness means listening to stakeholders, adapting to shifting contexts, embracing diversity, and empowering voices often left unheard. This is key to making evaluation relevant and actionable in today’s world.

Accepted Strands from Call A

Please note that some strands are currently being consolidated, and their descriptions will be updated constantly.

Last update: 24 March

Claire LeBlanc, NIRAS
Dima Issa, NIRAS
Kai Brand-Jacobsen, Norwegian Development Cooperation 
Lydeke Schakel, European Endowment For Democracy

Olga Mrinska, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Raphaëlle Bisiaux, NIRAS
Rebekah Usatin, National Endowment for Democracy

Charlotte Halpern, Sciences Po
Thomas Delahais, Quadrant Conseil

Claudio Alberti, OECD, Development Co-operation Directorate
Megan Grace Kennedy Chouane, OECD, Development Co-operation Directorate

Alix De Saint-albin, Pluricité
Bianca Montrosse-moorhead, University Of Connecticut

Linda Raftree, MERL Tech Initiative (MTI)
Steffen Bohni Nielsen,National Research Centre for the Working Environment

Bridget Dillon, DDA
Joanna Hofman, Ipsos UK

José Carbajo, Morera Consulting Ltd
Oto Potluka, University of Basel

Jaynie Vonk, Oxfam Novib
Karen Biesbrouck, Oxfam Novib

Petra Novakova, EES TWG 1
Svetlana Negroustoueva, CGIAR – Independent Evaluation Function

Vincent Ssenyondo, Africa Evaluation Association (AfrEA)
Catherine Namande, Uganda Evaluation Association
John LaVelle, American Journal Of Evaluation

Gabriel Keney, Saint Francis University
Patricia Rogers, Purposeful Program Theory
Dugan Fraser, Indicate Impact