Frequently Asked Questions
Pre-Conference Professional Development Workshops (PDWs)
1. What are the Pre-Conference Professional Development Workshops (PDWs)?
PDWs are one-day, in-depth professional training workshops delivered by experienced facilitators. They take place over the 2 days before the EES 2026 Biennial Conference on Monday and Tuesday and offer participants the opportunity to deepen their knowledge, exchange experiences, and engage in highly interactive learning.
2. When will the PDWs take place?
The PDWs will be held on 26–27 October 2026, during the two days preceding the official opening of the EES 2026 Conference.
3. Who can submit a PDW proposal?
Anyone with relevant expertise in evaluation theory or practice may submit a proposal. Facilitators are encouraged to have prior training or workshop experience, though emerging trainers with innovative ideas are also welcome.
4. What topics are eligible for PDW proposals?
Proposals may address any aspect of evaluation theory and practice. Preference will be given to workshops aligned with the 2026 conference theme: “Evaluation for Vibrant Democracies”.
Relevant topics may include (but are not limited to):
- Evaluation and democratic governance
- Public policy and systems change
- Community engagement
- Climate change and sustainability
- Equity and inclusion
- Artificial intelligence and the future of evaluation
- Innovation and evaluation practice
- Evaluation of public policy transformation initiatives
5. In which language should workshops be delivered?
- Most PDWs will be delivered in English, the main conference language.
- Exceptionally for EES 2026, two workshops delivered in French will be selected, and proposals in French are encouraged.
6. What are the length and format requirements for proposals?
- Proposals must be no longer than 1,000 words (excluding biographies and supplementary information).
- Submissions must follow the structure provided in the submission form and guidelines available on the conference website.
7. Do proposals need to be anonymised?
Yes. All proposals must be fully anonymised to allow for a double-blind peer review process. A separate document containing facilitator biography/biographies and workshop experience must be submitted for review by the PDW Coordinating Team.
8. Can facilitators who presented at previous EES conferences apply again?
Yes. Facilitators who previously delivered PDWs at EES conferences are welcome to apply again. However, they are expected to update and enhance their content and, where relevant, align it with the 2026 conference theme and sub-themes.
9. How many proposals can I submit?
You may submit multiple PDW proposals, and each proposal will be reviewed independently.
10. What is the deadline for submitting a proposal?
The deadline for proposal submission is 15 March 2026 at 23:59 CET.
11. When will I be notified of the decision?
Applicants will be informed of acceptance or rejection by mid-May 2026.
12. What is the review process?
All proposals undergo a double-blind peer review based on the following criteria:
- Relevance to current evaluation debates
- Clarity of learning objectives and structure
- Innovation in content or learning approach
- Level of participatory and interactive engagement
- Completeness and anonymisation of the proposal
The EES PDW Coordinating Team will then conduct a final review, considering facilitator experience and overall programme balance.
13. What compensation is provided to selected facilitators?
EES will provide the following compensatory package:
Main facilitator:
- One free conference registration
- Two nights' accommodation in a hotel selected by the conference organisers.
Second facilitator (if applicable):
- 50% reduction in the conference registration fee
14. Who is considered the main facilitator?
The person who submits the proposal is automatically designated as the main facilitator and the primary contact for all correspondence and benefits. If there are multiple facilitators, only one person should submit the proposal on behalf of the group.
15. How do I submit a PDW proposal?
PDW proposals must be submitted via the official submission portal available on the conference website.
16. Where can I find guidance on preparing my proposal?
Please visit the PDW webpage available on the conference website. You can also consult the Guidelines tab in the submission system, which provides detailed instructions on proposal structure, content, and requirements.
17. Who should I contact for support?
For technical assistance with your submission, please contact Conference Secretariat at ees2026@kuonitumlare.com.
For questions related to content or expertise, please contact Marlène Laeubli (marlene.laeubli@bluewin.ch) or Rosa Maria Flores (rosy.flores@lees.org.mx).
18. What happens after my proposal is accepted?
Once the final PDW selection has been made:
- All facilitators' names will be added to the final programme announcement on the conference website.
- Accepted facilitators will receive further logistical and organisational information from the conference team.
- Selected PDWs are added to the registration system and offered to participants for purchase.
Conference Submissions: General Questions
1.What types of conference proposals can I submit?
For EES 2026, there are two types of submissions:
- Call A – Strands: Coordinated thematic blocks of connected sessions (“mini-conferences”)
- Call B – Individual Contributions: Stand-alone sessions: panels, fishbowls, sparking discussions, papers, and posters
Each call has its own timeline and submission requirements that can be consulted on the conference website. Call B proposals should be aligned with one of the strands selected through Call A, which will be published before Call B opens, or with the general conference strands (New Methods, Responsiveness, Systemic Learning).
2.What is the difference between Call A and Call B?
- Call A (Strands) is for submitting proposals to coordinate a full thematic strand.
- Call B (Individual Submissions) is for proposing individual sessions, papers, panels, or posters within conference strands. Call B proposals should be aligned with one of the strands selected through Call A or with the general conference strands (New Methods, Responsiveness, Systemic Learning).
3. When are the submission deadlines?
- Call A (Strands):
Deadline: 31 January 2026, 23:59 CET
Notification of acceptance: 14 February 2026
- Call B (Individual Submissions):
Deadline: 31 March 2026, 23:59 CET
Please note: Due to the two-stage call structure, no deadline extensions for Call A can be granted.
4. How do I submit a conference proposal?
Proposals must be submitted via the official EES 2026 Conference Submission Portal available on the conference website.
5. Who is listed as the primary contact for a submission?
The person who submits the proposal will automatically be identified as the main presenter and primary contact for all future correspondence and will have to make sure that all co-presenters are registered.
If there is more than one presenter, we kindly ask that one person coordinates and submits a single proposal on behalf of the group.
For Call A (Strands), each strand must have two coordinators; one of them should act as the submitting coordinator.
6. How many proposals can I submit?
- Individuals may submit a maximum of two proposals in total across Call A and Call B.
- If you submitted an accepted strand proposal under Call A, you may submit only one additional proposal under Call B.
- If you did not submit a strand under Call A, you may submit up to two proposals under Call B.
- An exception is granted to Thematic Working Group (TWG) leaders who submit a TWG-related contribution; in this case, they may submit a maximum of three submissions, including Strand and Individual submissions.
7. In which language should proposals be submitted?
8. Do I need to register for the conference if my proposal is accepted?
9. Where can I find guidance on preparing my submission?
Please visit the Call for Proposals webpage available on the conference website.
You can also consult the Guidelines tab in the submission portal, which provides detailed instructions, examples, and formatting requirements for both strands and individual submissions.
10. Can I submit a proposal as a team or group?
Yes. Both individual and group submissions are welcome. For group submissions, one person must act as the coordinator and submit the proposal on behalf of all presenters.
The person who submits the proposal will automatically be identified as the main presenter and primary contact for all future correspondence and will have to make sure that all co-presenters are registered.
For Call A (Strands), each strand must have two coordinators; one of them should act as the submitting coordinator.
11. Will I receive funding for my participation?
12. I am eager to share my work at the conference. What should I do?
If you wish to propose an individual presentation, you may do so under Call B (opening on 14 February). You will need to select one of the accepted strands from Call A or one of the general conference strands (New Methods, Responsiveness, Systemic Learning) that aligns with your contribution.
If relevant, the programme team and/or strand coordinators may contact you to discuss potential adaptations to your proposal in light of the overall strand development. We appreciate your cooperation and flexibility throughout this process.
13. Several colleagues and I are interested in organizing a session as part of a strand in Call A, but we are unsure how to proceed. Should we submit a strand proposal under Call A, or wait until Call B to propose a specific format within a selected strand?
Both options are possible. Please note however that a maximum of two proposals for the conference in total (across Call A and Call B) is allowed. For instance, if a strand proposal was accepted under Call A, the proposer may submit only one additional proposal under Call B. If the submitter did not participate in Call A, they may submit up to two proposals under Call B. An exception is granted to Thematic Working Group (TWG) leaders who submit a TWG-related contribution; in this case, they may submit a maximum of three submissions, including Strand and Individual submissions.
Each strand proposal under Call A must include at least one and up to six session proposals. Strand proposals will be reviewed by the EES Conference Programme Committee, which will determine how many of the proposed sessions are accepted. Any remaining slots in accepted strands will be filled with proposals submitted under Call B.
Even if a strand is full, proposers in Call B can still select the relevant strand to ensure their sessions are thematically aligned and visible in the programme alongside the main strand sessions.
14. Can I revise my submission?
15. How are submissions evaluated?
16.How can I contact the conference team?
If you need any assistance with submitting your proposal(s), please do not hesitate to reach out to us at ees2026@kuonitumlare.com.
For questions related to content or expertise (to discuss potential strand ideas), please contact of the EES Conference Programme Coordinators: Marta Semplici or John LaVelle.
Call A - Strands
1. What is a strand?
2. What happens if my strand proposal is only partially accepted?
3. What is expected from strand coordinators after acceptance?
Accepted strand coordinators are expected to:
- Coordinate with session facilitators and presenters within their strand
- Collaborate with programme coordinators to finalize strand details prior to the launch of Call B
- Review Call B submissions addressed to their strand
- Finalize session structure and coherence
- Meet deadlines set by the Programme Committee
4. Should I define each of the proposed 1 to 6 sessions’ length and content when submitting a strand proposal under Call A?
5. What if no strand seems to fit our topic?
Call B requires you to select the strand under which you are submitting your proposal. The full list of accepted strands, together with the general conference strands (New Methods, Responsiveness, Systemic Learning), will be published on 14 February.
For any further queries, please contact the conference team: lavelle.eval@gmail.com; marta.semplici@gmail.com
6. We are considering submitting a strand proposal but are concerned about potential overlaps with other submissions. Should we submit our proposal anyway?
There is scope for discussion with the programme and strand coordinators to refine the details of the strands. This may include potential mergers or redesigns following conversations with participants who have similar interests or compatible proposals.
We encourage you to highlight potential links to other topics in your proposal. Your cooperation and flexibility regarding these adaptations are welcomed.
7. When will I know if my strand proposal has been accepted?
Call B - Stand-alone sessions
1. Do I need to select a strand when submitting under Call B?
2. What submission types (modalities) are accepted under Call B?
- Panels
- Fishbowls / Birds of a Feather sessions
- Solution-focused sessions
- Meet the Evaluation sessions
- Sparking Discussions
- Individual papers
- Posters
3. Are submissions reviewed anonymously?
4. What criteria are used to review proposals?
Proposals are assessed based on:
- Relevance to the conference theme and strand
- Quality and clarity of the proposal
- Innovation in ideas or approach
- Audience engagement and interactivity
Relevance and quality carry the greatest weight. Diversity among presenters and perspectives is strongly encouraged.
5. Can my proposal be reassigned to a different strand?
6. Can strand coordinators also submit individual sessions or papers?
7. Can I participate in more than two scheduled events/contributions?
No. Individuals may participate in a maximum of two programme events/contributions in any capacity (presenter, moderator, or discussant). The only exception is if an individual is invited by the EES to chair a session. No other exceptions will be granted.
In addition, an exception is granted to Thematic Working Group (TWG) leaders who submit a TWG-related contribution; in this case, they may be involved in up to three events. No other exceptions will be granted.
If an individual is involved in more than two events/contributions, they will be disqualified from review, rejected, or, if discovered closer to the conference date, removed from the programme.