Conference Strands
General Conference Strands
S01_ New Methods
Evaluation thrives when methods evolve. From established approaches to emerging tools and the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence, the aim is that this conference allows us to examine how technology and innovation can enhance rigor, relevance, and impact which is critical to strong democracies. Simultaneously allowing space for the exploration into adaptive, inclusive, and future-oriented methods that are relevant to the transformation into, and thereafter sustainability of, better societies.
S02_ Systemic Learning
Complex societal challenges demand more than isolated interventions. Therefore this conference will allow us to explore system-level approaches that drive transformational change, and how evaluators can navigate complexity while maintaining accountability and learning which is critical to healthy democracies.
S03_ Responsiveness
Democracies are dynamic - and so is evaluation. Responsiveness means listening to stakeholders, adapting to shifting contexts, embracing diversity, and empowering voices often left unheard. This is key to making evaluation relevant and actionable in today’s world.
Accepted Strands from Call A
Please note that some strands are currently being consolidated, and their descriptions will be updated constantly.
Last update: 24 March
Claire LeBlanc, NIRAS
Dima Issa, NIRAS
Kai Brand-Jacobsen, Norwegian Development Cooperation
Lydeke Schakel, European Endowment For Democracy
Olga Mrinska, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Raphaëlle Bisiaux, NIRAS
Rebekah Usatin, National Endowment for Democracy
Jaroslav Dvorak, Klaipeda University
Tomasz Kupiec, University of Warsaw
Ian Goldman, International Evaluation Academy
May Pettigrew, EES
Aida El Khoury de Paula, Independent consultant
Glenn O'neil, Owl RE
Ananda Millard, Policy Research Institute
Tom Ling, RAND
Geeta Baatra
Sven Harten, German Institute for Development Evaluation
Charlotte Halpern, Sciences Po
Thomas Delahais, Quadrant Conseil
José Carbajo, Morera Consulting Ltd
Miriam Amine, DEG Impulse
Claudio Alberti, OECD, Development Co-operation Directorate
Megan Grace Kennedy Chouane, OECD, Development Co-operation Directorate
Alix De Saint-albin, Pluricité
Bianca Montrosse-moorhead, University Of Connecticut
Linda Raftree, MERL Tech Initiative (MTI)
Steffen Bohni Nielsen,National Research Centre for the Working Environment
Bridget Dillon, DDA
Joanna Hofman, Ipsos UK
José Carbajo, Morera Consulting Ltd
Oto Potluka, University of Basel
Jaynie Vonk, Oxfam Novib
Karen Biesbrouck, Oxfam Novib
Petra Novakova, EES TWG 1
Svetlana Negroustoueva, CGIAR – Independent Evaluation Function
Emanuela Carta, Verian
Liliana Olivia Lucaciu, TWG8
Vincent Ssenyondo, Africa Evaluation Association (AfrEA)
Catherine Namande, Uganda Evaluation Association
John LaVelle, American Journal Of Evaluation
Gabriel Keney, Saint Francis University
Patricia Rogers, Purposeful Program Theory
Dugan Fraser, Indicate Impact